Emerging lessons about the catalytic role of Natural Resource Governance in the effective implementation of NDCs in Latin America
1951 Downloads
This study pursues the following objectives:
- Identify challenges and best practices at the local level related to natural resource governance processes in Latin American countries.
- Explore strategic proposals for local actions to contribute to formal and informal multi-level governance frameworks to support NDC implementation.
- Promote inputs for South-South exchanges of experience and knowledge among local actors facing similar challenges in Latin America.
In order to understand and demonstrate the multidimensional nature of governance, six case studies of projects implemented in Latin America under the EUROCLIMA+ thematic sector "Forests, Biodiversity and Ecosystems" (BBE) were analysed. These case studies generated evidence on the most important barriers to promote the adoption of a bottom-up approach to natural resource governance.These barriers jeopardise the sustainability and effectiveness of natural resource management and thus its contribution to resolving climate change challenges, also impacting NDC processes. Barriers identified include limited access to information, inadequate capacities for participation in governance processes, limited stakeholder participation, and lack of coordination. The experiences of the six case studies have generated examples of best practices on how to overcome these barriers, drawing on aspects of governance from an NDC approach.
| Category: | Serie Documentos técnicos |
| File Size: | 21.63 MB |
| Hits: | 9084 Hits |
| Download: | 1951 times |
| Título: | Emerging lessons about the catalytic role of Natural Resource Governance in the effective implementation of NDCs in Latin America |
| Autor: | Thora Amend, PhD, Lili Ilieva PhD and Alicia Ruíz. Revision by Sophie Krause, María Fernanda Contreras, Mauricio Luna Rodríguez and Loreto Koller Mohr. |
| Año: | 2021 |
| Formato: | PDF 59p |
Related documents
The project “Green Economic Recovery: Mobilizing investments towards a low-emission and climate-resilient economy in Latin America and the Caribbean” aimed to support selected LAC countries (Argentina, Costa Rica, Grenada, Honduras and Panama) to address the main barriers faced by countries when designing, planning and financing post-COVID-19 recovery plans aligned with the Paris Agreement.
The participation of indigenous peoples in climate action is widely recognised as a crucial element in formulating inclusive and effective policies. This is not only because indigenous peoples receive relatively greater impacts resulting from the effects of climate change and biodiversity loss, but also because they possess traditional knowledge, technologies and practices for climate change mitigation and adaptation.
La recopilación de experiencias de sobre co-innovación para el desarrollo se desarrolló en el marco del sector temático Producción Resiliente de Alimentos (PRA) del programa EUROCLIMA+, financiado por la Unión Europea y cofinanciado por el gobierno federal de Alemania a través del Ministerio Federal de Cooperación Económica y Desarrollo (BMZ), así como los gobiernos de Francia y España. Las acciones en el sector PRA son implementadas por la Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) y Expertise France.
Este proyecto fue concebido para contribuir de forma significativa al objetivo global de componente vertical Producción Resiliente de Alimentos de EUROCLIMA+
NbS have played a central role in the discussions at the Conferences of the Parties (COPs) in recent years, especially at the COP 26 in Glasgow, Scotland. Despite the fact that NbS are widely recognized as effective measures to address the challenges associated with climate change, there are still some challenges to their implementation.
This document analyses Brazil’s main risk management instruments: the Agricultural Activity Guarantee Programme (Proagro) and the Rural Insurance Premium Subsidy Programme (PSR). The objective of analysis is to demonstrate the structure of the two programmes and describe main differences, strengths, and weaknesses.